Goodreads

The ultimate SMART stovetop to ensure an efficient and effective cooking session

overview
Goodreads dominates the book industry but faces criticism for their UX/UI. As a person who loves UX design and books, I decided to conduct a total redesign of the platform to create the go-to platform for readers
PROJECT INFO
DURATION: 4 weeks (Dec- Jan 2022)
ROLE: UX Researcher, Product designer
SOFTWARE: Figma, Adobe Illustrator & Photoshop, Miro, Artboard
Upon the merge, Amazon’s VP of Kindle content shared this statement to shed light on what they hope to accomplish with the merge:
Amazon and Goodreads share a passion for reinventing reading... Together we intend to build many new ways to delight reads and authors alike
- Ross Grandinetti
Amazon VP of Kindle content
why redesign?
My goal is to further fulfill Amazon’s goal to “reinvent reading” by building ways to delight readers and authors. This project focuses on the reader’s problems due to time constraints and impact potential.
1
Reduce abandonment rate
2
Reduce time to accomplish tasks
3
Increase brand loyalty
4
Increase user satisfaction by 75%
Based off this data, I discovered a gap in the user’s experience. While they primarily use Goodreads to discover new books, their satisfaction is average and the push factor to read a book is outside WOM.
ux/ui review
According to users, these are the primary reasons they use the app:
1. Discover new recommendations
2. Update reading progress
3. Keep track of what to read next

Naturally, I focused my audit on these features in the app.
wireframes
I presented multiple options for my users to test and provide feedback on until their avg satisfaction rate was raised to 4-5 stars
I adjusted the flow of the “new post” feature to address the concerns users had over privacy and clutter.

“...I'd think of how this on a larger scale. Sometimes a lot of the same questions/polls are asked...within forums...so it could get a little messy and repetitive.”

"When posted, does this go to your profile then to Community? Or does the community only see it? How does this post work?"
the redesign
Goodreads is more than a book tracker. Overtime, Goodreads will learn more about what you like to tailor your recommendations accordingly. Discover more books you'll love in less time.
smart tracking
Personalize your experience by tagging moods and sensitive material.

With each update, Goodreads gets smarter. It'll learn your preferences and what you respond to, to better recommend future reads.
---

Simultaneously, publishers and authors can learn about their readers' behavior to identify what content they respond best to. (i.e. Are readers reacting how the author intended them to? Are they not finishing around the same spot of the book?)
precision
Once you mark a book “read” the Goodread’s review section will appear to remind you to give feedback.

Ratings and reviews are essential for Goodread’s model but the current rating system doesn’t reflect current behavior.

By allowing you to rate with quarter and half stars, you can rate more confidently and authentically.
Taking recommendations to a new level
personalization
Recommendations based on what you love
time saver
Find top book recommendations with refined search tools
reliable
Discover book recommendations from users with similar tastes
personalization
Goodreads takes a holistic approach to recommendations by considering your reading preferences as a whole.

More ratings & reviews = better recommendations
time saver
various explore options
Wish to browse? Save your top genres to easily explore your favorite genres and what's popular
Have a specific niche in mind? Narrow your search
Want to skip the browsing? Take the book quiz
perfect book: perfect time
sorting at your fingertips
Goodreads understands sometimes choosing what book to read next is part of the battle. Locate the books you want when you want it
New organization system:
Think playlists for books. Whether they're public or private, these reading list names will remind you why you added the book to your "want to read" list--even if it's 100+ long

View it all at a glance.

You can view your lists by adjusting the sorting view.
The organization system starts when you add a book to your “want to read” list. Organize the book by tagging it in your public or private list.

The reading list names will be visible to you in the genre section.
all-in-one social space
No need to search other sites to find book recommendations and share opinions. With the community tab, you can share and discover from others all on one platform.
connecting readers...thoughtfully
Users can share their thoughts, memes, and etc. with like-minded users all on Goodreads.
Share content with people who share your interests.

Choose whether you'd like to post to your followers or to a group you're a part of.

Goodreads keeps digital clutter at a minimum by sharing similar posts.
Social media but optimized for books.

Tag books, images, videos, and etc. to make it easier for others to access your recommendations!
share what you want
Not everything is meant to be shared. In addition to private reading lists, choose which books you'd like to keep private.
design decisions
Even though users didn’t complain about the homepage, I updated it anyway.

Why didn’t I listen to the user?
Because their responses to other questions told me otherwise. The current Goodreads home page is a feed of other users’ activity. However, users shared the primary reasons they open the app is to search for new recommendations and to update their reading statuses.

Therefore, I adjusted it to reflect a more personalized experience that matched their behavior and moved the feed page to a community tab.
I decided to distinguish user’s “want to read”, “currently reading” and “read” lists as status lists while any custom list they create are considered “reading lists”.

Why distinguish?
Put simply, to improve organization. Many users add books to their “want to read” list and end up having to sort through hundreds of books. With the “save to reading list” on the same page, users have a visual reminder that they can tag the book for future reference.

Why is there an extra status?
Several users created a custom “did not finish” or “dnf” list to their profile. I added to reflect their current behavior.
interact with the prototype
design reflection

1. It’s important to read between the lines. Most users didn’t have any major complains about the platform. This initially concerned me since I didn’t know what to improve. However, as I examined their answers, I began to uncover insights into what I could design.

2. Design never ends. If it weren’t for the time constraint I gave myself, I could’ve continued expanding my solution forever. I recognized the value of an MVP.

3. There’s value in observing users' behaviors. While users weren’t outright complaining about the lack of certain features, I was able to identify areas of opportunity for where they applied what I like to call “band-aid fixes”.

next steps

If I had more time, these are the top 3 things I'd further develop
- Similarity scores between users. I'd like to show what users can see when comparing profiles
- Integration between Kindle and Goodreads to create a seamless and connected experience
- Integration with Tiktok and YouTube content.

Goodreads

The ultimate platform for readers